Editorial: The (Apple) Crying Game

Posted In Editorial, Featured - By Dann On Friday, June 29th, 2012 With 3 Comments

Apple has won an injunction against Samsung today, specifically pinpointing the Galaxy Nexus, with Judge Koh starting: “Apple has articulated a plausible theory of irreparable harm” due to “long-term loss of market share and “losses of downstream sales.”

Why did she say this? Apparently she found a plausible cause within – get this – search functionality. That’s right folks, searching killed the Nexus for now. I can imagine Google running to the case soon to see if their proprietary information is affected as well.

This absolutely can’t sit well with anyone who has been following the game back and forth with lawsuits between these two giants who feel the urge to play schoolyard slap fights. It’s an embarrassment to the legal system, and an obvious attempt to leverage the court as a tool against competitors.

Apple has done everything – literally – to stop Samsung’s rise as a leader in high-end, excellent display, devices which can cut at Apple’s marketing efforts. Slowly but surely, their top spot with camera quality is dwindling and the screens are fairly at par. We can argue the theoretical differences that each display brings, but at the end of the day, the naked human eye wins.

This kind of desperation by Apple shows a darker side of the post-Jobs era; nothing truly innovative is coming soon. Everything that’s been mentioned by Apple to date have been improvements, no true innovation. Steve would have handled this differently. He wouldn’t freak out like Apple has into a desperate lawsuit ditch which shows just how damaged they are.

My biggest hope in all this has to be that a good guy is needed, and I hope Samsung steps up.

Via @FedcourtJunkie

About - Dann joined Android Invasion in March of 2012 as a contributor. He lives with his family. He currently uses a rooted Sensation 4G.

  • Jason Gardner

    “He wouldn’t freak out like Apple has into a desperate lawsuit ditch which shows just how damaged they are.”

    Oh really?

  • dann thursday

    Absolutely. I don’t think he would have at this point in the game with this particular scenario. His head would have been in bringing something radical to the table. Yes, it can be argued that he’s used other people’s ideas in the past but he’s also brought new to the table with. Gotta give credit where it’s due; the man wouldn’t just find something new, he’d make it so heavy it’d tip the scale.

  • Pingback: Weekly Roundup for July 1st – Google I/O 2012 | Android Invasion